Bookmark Kaumudi Online  Bookmark this site  Editor@Kaumudi  |  Marketing  Print Advt rates  |  Calendar 2018        Go!    
 
 
July 20, Friday 2018 8:23 PM       

       HEADLINES: Irregularity over Jail IG’s elevation: Finance department recommends action                                              Malabar cement corruption: Petition seeking CBI inquiry dismissed                                              In BJP list, there was no Kannanthanam: Kanam                                              Popular Front threatens to kill newly-married couple, DYFI steps in to protect                                              Jail warden found hanging                                              Rahul attacks Modi govt on several fronts                                              Stage set for debate on no-confidence motion against Modi govt in Lok Sabha                                              BJD walks out as LS begins debate on no trust motion against Modi govt                                              Congress emotionally exploited India: BJP                                              No-confidence motion: Shiv Sena boycotts parliamentary work                                              India, US to hold first ‘2+2 dialogue’ on Sept 6                                              Root and Morgan clinch decider for England in ODI series                                              Kaumudi Facebook
       INDIA Next Article: Seven killed, two missing in Manipur landslides  
       Centre leaves it to the wisdom of SC to decide validity of Section 377
 
         Posted on :14:20:03 Jul 11, 2018
   
A A
       Last edited on:00:37:42 Jul 12, 2018
         Tags: Centre, SC, Section 377
 

New Delhi: The Centre today told the Supreme Court that it would leave it to the wisdom of its judges to decide on the constitutional validity of Section 377 on the issue of criminalising unnatural intercourse between two consenting adults.

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, which is hearing a batch of petitions challenging its 2013 verdict that had re-criminalised consensual sex between two consenting adults of the same gender, was told by the Centre that it has no objection with the court dealing with the validity of this penal provision.

"We leave to the wisdom of the Court to deal with the validity of Section 377 so far as it relates to consensual sexual acts between two adults," Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, told the bench at the outset of the crucial hearing which entered the second day.

The bench, which also comprised Justices R F Nariman, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, said it has already made it clear yesterday that only the constitutional validity of Section 377 will be dealt with by it.

The law officer said that if the right to chose sexual partner is declared a fundamental right, then somebody may come up and say that he or she wanted to marry a sibling, which would be contrary to the laws governing to marriages.

"We are not considering all these issues. One cannot judge these issues in vacuum," the bench said.

Section 377 refers to 'unnatural offences' and says whoever voluntarily has carnal inter course against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to pay a fine.

The apex court had yesterday commenced the crucial hearing on a clutch of petitions seeking decriminalisation of consensual sex between two adults of the same gender.

The apex court had in 2013 restored sexual relationship between persons of the same sex as a criminal offence by setting aside the 2009 Delhi High Court judgement that had held as unconstitutional section 377 of the IPC, which makes such actions between two consenting adults of same sex as a penal offence.

A A
       INDIA
Next Article: Seven killed, two missing in Manipur landslides
 
 
INDIA HEADLINES
Rahul attacks Modi govt on several fronts  
No confidence motion: Rahul, PM hug after a fiery session  
No-confidence motion: PM calls for constructive, disruption-free debate  
No-confidence motion: Shiv Sena boycotts parliamentary work  
Congress emotionally exploited India: BJP  
BJD walks out as LS begins debate on no trust motion against Modi govt  
Stage set for debate on no-confidence motion against Modi govt in Lok Sabha  
2 lakh posts of Anganwadi staff lying vacant  
CBI files charge sheet against Chidambaram, son in Aircel-Maxis case  
Kamal differs with Rajini on greenfield road project  
Sudanese nationals get back lost baggage within 24 hours  
Assault on Swami Agnivesh disgraceful: Ramdev  
No-trust motion: TDP MP JC Diwakar Reddy refuses to attend crucial session  
14 killed after bus falls into gorge in Uttarakhand  
No-Confidence Motion: Shiv Sena expected to vote in favour of NDA  
Seven naxals including three women killed in Chattisgarh  
Delhi HC asks JNU not to take any coercive step against Kanhaiya till July 20  
No stopping sealing, demolition of unauthorised constructions in Delhi: SC  
1,10,333 cases of rape in India in 2014-16  
Law against lynching will help: Shiv Sena  
Stalin backs women's reservation bill, Rahul thanks him  
Mob lynchings due to economic disparity: BJP MP  
MiG 21 crashes in Kangra district of Himachal  
RS briefly adjourns over TDP's demands for Andhra package  
6 held for 'sexually assaulting' Russian tourist in TN  
 
Do you agree with Modi's stand that Kerala didn't use properly Central govt funds?
Yes
 
No
 
Don't know
 
 
 
Home Kerala India World Business Sports Sci&Tech Education Automobile CityNews Movies Environment Letters 
© Copyright keralakaumudi Online 2011  |  Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Head Office Address: Kaumudi Buildings, Pettah P.O, Trivandrum - 695024, India.
Online queries talk to Deepu Sasidharan, + 91 98472 38959 or Email deepu[at]kaumudi.com
Customer Service -Advertisement Disclaimer Statement   |  Copyright Policy